logKcalc vignette 1 2 3 4 5

Changing T and P and adding species (Au complexes)

This vignette shows a worked example for gold speciation diagrams.

This vignette was compiled on 2023-09-15 with logKcalc 0.1.1-2 and CHNOSZ 2.0.0-25.

To calculate the speciation and solubility of gold in hydrothermal solutions requires data over a large temperature range (e.g. 150–600 °C) for hydroxide, chloride, and sulfide complexes with Au (Akinfiev and Zotov, 2001; Akinfiev and Zotov, 2010; Pokrovski et al., 2014) as well as minerals that may buffer the oxidation and sulfidation state of the sytem (e.g. Helgeson et al., 1978). Here we add these species to a GWB thermodynamic data file and change the temperature and pressure for log K calculations.

The thermodynamic system is defined by thermo_12elements.tdat, which is a modfied version of GWB’s thermo.tdat file reduced to 12 elements (Al, Au, C, Cl, Fe, H, K, N, Na, O, S, and Si). As described in the previous vignette, we start by using modOBIGT() to include data for steam and additional minerals from SUPCRT92 that are not in the default database. If you want to use the SUPCRT92 versions of data for quartz, muscovite, and K-feldspar (and other minerals), use the command with "noBerman" instead.

reset()
modOBIGT(c("addSUPCRT", "steam"))
# modOBIGT(c("noBerman", "allSUPCRT", "steam"))

The ispecies argument can be used to identify other species from OBIGT that should be added to the output. Their dissociation reactions are written in terms of the available basis species in the GWB file. This example adds pyrrhotite and some aqueous Au complexes. The thermo.refs() command can be used to show the sources of data; here, just the reference keys from the OBIGT.bib file in CHNOSZ are printed.

ispecies <- info(c("pyrrhotite", "AuCl", "AuOH", "AuHS", "Au(HS)2-"))
thermo.refs(ispecies)$key
## [1] "HDNB78" "AZ01"   "AZ10"   "PAB+14"

Note that the input GWB file also has AuCl2- and AuCl4-; the log K values for the former are recalculated for the given T and P, but the latter is excluded from the output because it is not available in OBIGT.

This sets up the temperature (8 equally-spaced values from 150 to 500 °C) and pressure (1000 bar)

T <- round(seq(150, 550, length.out = 8))
P <- 1000

Now we perform the conversion.

infile <- system.file("extdata/thermo_12elements.tdat", package = "logKcalc")
outfile <- file.path(tempdir(), "logKcalc_vig3.tdat")
logKcalc(infile, outfile, T = T, P = P, ispecies = ispecies, maxprint = 10)

Because it has a different chemical formula in the GWB file and in OBIGT, pyrrhotite is initially removed from the system. However, by listing it in ispecies, it is subsequently added with a dissociation reaction corresponding to its chemical formula and thermodynamic properties from OBIGT.

Scripts and output of GWB runs.

Figure 2 of Williams-Jones et al. (2009) shows two speciation diagrams for Au as a function of temperature. Both diagrams are made for a solution with 1.5 m NaCl and 0.5 m KCl; the ratio aK+/aH+ (and therefore pH for a given activity of K+) is set by the quartz–muscovite–K-feldspar (QMK) buffer. To perform the buffer calculation in GWB, we run this script for the React program, which uses the thermodynamic data file created above. The first plot below shows that the minerals in the buffer are supersaturated (i.e., remain in excess) at all temperatures; the second plot shows the values of pH in the QMK buffer with an initial molality of K+ equal to 0.5.

Based on this plot, we choose pH = 4.7 as a representative value to make the following diagrams. The React script for the first diagram sets up the hematite–magnetite (HM) oxygen fugacity (fO2) buffer and adds 0.01 mol S to the system. The React script for the second diagram sets up the pyrite–pyrrhotite–magnetite (PPM) buffer, which defines both fO2 and sulfur fugacity (fS2). The mineral abundances are chosen so that all of the minerals in the buffers are supersaturated at all temperatures; for the HM calculation the formation of pyrite and pyrrhotite is suppressed.

The resulting plots are similar to Figure 2 of Williams-Jones et al. (2009) but not exactly alike because of more recent thermodynamic data used here (Akinfiev and Zotov, 2010; Pokrovski et al., 2014).

References

Akinfiev NN, Zotov AV. 2001. Thermodynamic description of chloride, hydrosulfide, and hydroxo complexes of Ag(I), Cu(I), and Au(I) at temperatures of 25-500°C and pressures of 1-2000 bar. Geochemistry International 39(10): 990–1006.

Akinfiev NN, Zotov AV. 2010. Thermodynamic description of aqueous species in the system Cu-Ag-Au-S-O-H at temperatures of 0-600°C and pressures of 1-3000 bar. Geochemistry International 48(7): 714–720. doi: 10.1134/S0016702910070074

Helgeson HC, Delany JM, Nesbitt HW, Bird DK. 1978. Summary and critique of the thermodynamic properties of rock-forming minerals. American Journal of Science 278A: 1–229. Available at http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/13594862.

Pokrovski GS, Akinfiev NN, Borisova AY, Zotov AV, Kouzmanov K. 2014. Gold speciation and transport in geological fluids: Insights from experiments and physical-chemical modelling. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 402(1): 9–70. doi: 10.1144/SP402.4

Williams-Jones AE, Bowell RJ, Migdisov AA. 2009. Gold in solution. Elements 5(5): 281–287. doi: 10.2113/gselements.5.5.281